Loading this page’s records…
Loading this page’s records…
SharpRoster policy
Last updated August 2026
SharpRoster is an evidence-first sports analytics platform. This policy explains what may be published, what may be monetized, and how we handle reports and repeat violations.
This policy applies to every person who uses SharpRoster and to every description, post, pick, analysis, link, image, message, storefront, plan, or other content submitted to or distributed through SharpRoster. It is part of our Terms of Service.
Content may be held, removed, demonetized, or kept out of search while we review it. A creator cannot publish or sell content by bypassing a moderation decision.
You must not submit, publish, sell, link to, or promote:
Creators are responsible for every piece of content submitted through their account.
A paid card is licensed to the account that bought it, for that person’s own use. Picks are sold before the games start, which is exactly when redistributing them destroys what the capper sold.
Creator submissions pass through automated pre-publication screening for policy signals. High-confidence signals are blocked. Uncertain signals are held for human review. Content is not eligible for monetization while it is pending, held, rejected, removed, or demonetized.
Automated screening can miss context and can be wrong. A human moderator may request more information, correct a false positive, or take action based on a report or other evidence.
Anyone can report potentially violating content without an account using the SharpRoster reporting form. Rights holders may identify themselves and explain their rights or provide supporting information. Reports are stored in a private review queue and are not publicly visible.
When a report is received, we may:
Do not knowingly submit false or abusive reports. We may restrict reporting access or take account action when the reporting system is misused.
We use a rolling enforcement record. A first lower-level violation may result in a warning and removal of the offending content. A repeated violation may result in a formal strike, demonetization, or temporary suspension. Continued or serious violations may result in permanent termination and removal of associated content.
Enforcement considers severity, intent, harm, cooperation, prior history, and whether the creator tried to evade an earlier action. A creator may request a review of an enforcement decision with relevant facts or evidence; an appeal does not restore monetization while the original decision is under review.
We may update this policy when the service, law, payment requirements, or enforcement practices change. The current version is always available at this URL. Questions, rights-holder notices, and corrections should begin through the reporting and takedown form.